It is currently 12 Dec 2017 05:14

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: BIOS dumps naming
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2017 10:20 
Offline

Joined: 29 Aug 2017 10:46
Posts: 7
Guys how about to rename all BIOS dumps for one look style like this one:

[BIOS] dump name.ext

It would be more handy to identity bios dumps.
Look into SNES set for instance where mostly bios dumps are starts from the S letter.
And I think all the other sets would be fine too like it already in GBX/GBA sets done.

Also maybe it would be good to add some prefix to cheating roms like Game Genie/Action Replay etc. right a the rom name starts. Something universal like [BIOS] or like BS roms have.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIOS dumps naming
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2017 16:45 
Offline

Joined: 29 Jan 2015 23:00
Posts: 132
I believe this is already the standard per section 3.11 of the No-Intro naming convention. Could you point us to a BIOS that doesn't have the BIOS flag (remember, BIOSes must be firmware from the console itself)?

I see no reason for a flag for cheating ROMs as there is with BIOSes. Cheating ROMs are not fundamentally different than other ROMs, whereas BIOSes are different in that they aren't from a cartidge and they are in a different format than cartridge ROMs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIOS dumps naming
PostPosted: 19 Oct 2017 05:56 
Offline

Joined: 29 Aug 2017 10:46
Posts: 7
It seems to me I wrote some bullshit... I'll check it out for SNES set.
For cheating roms I mean some [CHEAT] or [TRAINER[ somethin like this prefix.
Btw X-Band dump have no any identity prefix or 'modem' word in dump name. In good tools it can be easely identity coz of it. So in PCE express cards dumps naming starts from [BIOS]. Is it dump from consoles itself nor from external carts?
I just trying to say it would be good to recheck when there is time for it all sets for hardware dumps like trainers, modems and any other cart extensions and rename it to more handy way. Like Aging cassette which presented in SNES and GBA. It's just named Aging cassette. So maybe some [TESTER] or something like this prefix would be good for it?
Some chips dumps have name like 'dump name (Enhancement chip)'. Maybe it good to rename it to '[ENHANCEMENT CHIP] dump name'? To easely identity and sorting in sets.
Anyway it's up to ya. And I need to read naming rules i never did.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIOS dumps naming
PostPosted: 19 Oct 2017 07:22 
Offline

Joined: 29 Aug 2017 10:46
Posts: 7
I'm just trying to clean up my rom sets (i've not so much). Right now I'm in SNES set. I prefer to have merged sets. And there is lots of works. Some merged archives have wrong names and I try to wrote about it right in dat-o-matic but maybe ya can add me into tour team to clean up merged dat files? I can recheck my lil sets collection for NES, SNES, SMS, SGG, GEN, GBX, GBA, NGP/C. I mean not correct dump names but merged archives. wgich conteain few dumps and named like 'dump name (region) (rev x)' instread of 'dump name (region)'. There is lot of work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIOS dumps naming
PostPosted: 20 Oct 2017 03:38 
Offline
Datter
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2009 04:42
Posts: 292
You can't fix the merged sets problem you're speaking of from the position of datter. If that could be done, I'd have fixed it myself. There is nothing to "clean up" to fix it, is what I'm saying. A problem like you're seeing would be because of a bug in the system. Not you nor I could fix that without the proper coding experience. I don't know about you, but that sort of thing is above my level.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIOS dumps naming
PostPosted: 20 Oct 2017 12:03 
Offline

Joined: 29 Aug 2017 10:46
Posts: 7
I though it can be fixed in parent/clone dat contant. But... Well... whateva. It's not my church to rule it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BIOS dumps naming
PostPosted: 20 Oct 2017 15:49 
Offline
Datter
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2009 04:42
Posts: 292
Do I come across as harsh or angry in my posts? Sorry. I don't intend to. :( I'm not angry at all. I was merely stating that the parent/clone data is already okay. The errors would not be in there. They'd be elsewhere in the system.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group