Stance on protos in system sets?

General No-Intro related discussions.
Post Reply
FitzRoy
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 Aug 2017 09:10

Stance on protos in system sets?

Post by FitzRoy » 03 Oct 2018 13:47

Do you guys have any plans to create a superset of protos and betas from every system so that they stop cluttering up the main sets?

I want you to imagine going into the library, looking for a book, and seeing unfinished manuscripts right next to every other book. On the same shelf, given the same billing. This is what it's like scrolling through your romsets.

I get that they can be interesting windows into the game's development. But... each game had thousands of work-in-progress versions. Do we really need to treat the few that leaked out as some kind of vital historical artifact? Because I really don't think they are. And many of them are unverifiable, dumped from a one-of-a-kind cart years ago from who knows where. They could be bad dumps, good dumps, hacked dumps, fakes... and even if we have a trusted dumper, no one else can double verify it because it's a unique cart.

Hiccup
Datter
Posts: 458
Joined: 09 Oct 2015 11:29

Re: Stance on protos in system sets?

Post by Hiccup » 03 Oct 2018 19:24

"Do we really need to treat the few that leaked out as some kind of vital historical artifact?"
In my opinion yes.

There could always be an option to filter out protos/betas from your dat or your view in dom.

FitzRoy
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 Aug 2017 09:10

Re: Stance on protos in system sets?

Post by FitzRoy » 04 Oct 2018 00:43

Hiccup wrote:
03 Oct 2018 19:24
There could always be an option to filter out protos/betas from your dat or your view in dom.
Which is kind of like saying Cowering's (b)ad dumps and (h)acked dumps don't inflate sets, because you can just filter/ignore them. Perhaps you can filter them out of view from a dumping log, but that's the only place.

There is a file request forum, which shall not be named, but they have no-intro threads and it's just page after page of people asking for missing betas and protos. Endless requests for missing protos. Because the SNES dat is telling them they're missing files. Anyone looking for legit releases has to sift through that junk.

All that needs to happen here is betas getting their own superset away from actually released games. Don't remove them entirely like bad dumps, just get them out of the set space so that it doesn't utterly dominate collection discussion.

badinsults
Posts: 247
Joined: 05 Jun 2008 01:34

Re: Stance on protos in system sets?

Post by badinsults » 04 Oct 2018 07:41

You really think that the rom kiddies will stop requesting prototypes if they are in a separate spot?

FitzRoy
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 Aug 2017 09:10

Re: Stance on protos in system sets?

Post by FitzRoy » 04 Oct 2018 09:40

badinsults wrote:
04 Oct 2018 07:41
You really think that the rom kiddies will stop requesting prototypes if they are in a separate spot?
Yes, because the threads are per dat.

Hiccup
Datter
Posts: 458
Joined: 09 Oct 2015 11:29

Re: Stance on protos in system sets?

Post by Hiccup » 04 Oct 2018 18:57

I guess having protos/betas in a seperate dat could be an option.

hydr0x
Dumper
Posts: 877
Joined: 25 May 2008 15:31

Re: Stance on protos in system sets?

Post by hydr0x » 08 Oct 2018 07:48

Yeah, sure, removing historically important artifacts and creating a hell of a mess (what happens with prototypes of never-released games? are those unimportant crap as well?) is something we should absolutely go for just so you don't have to be annoyed by ROM kids cluttering a ROM topic you are following...

FitzRoy
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 Aug 2017 09:10

Re: Stance on protos in system sets?

Post by FitzRoy » 08 Oct 2018 11:30

hydr0x wrote:
08 Oct 2018 07:48
Yeah, sure, removing historically important artifacts and creating a hell of a mess (what happens with prototypes of never-released games? are those unimportant crap as well?) is something we should absolutely go for just so you don't have to be annoyed by ROM kids cluttering a ROM topic you are following...
-You act like there's vast options for finding the latest revisions and redumps. Rom sites are generally years behind and many have been shut down by Nintendo the past year.
-They visually inflate every list, not just threads.
-Betas of games that were finalized truly aren't that important and most were so close to final that the differences are tiny and uninteresting
-Protos of games that weren't released are important (like Star Fox 2 at the time), but don't deserve the same attention and treatment as released games.
-Betas can't really be verified. In many cases, we don't even know it's a real beta, you're just guessing and giving it that tag because it used to be tagged as the actual release until a redump exposed it. In other words, you've got hacks and bad dumps in your sets, guaranteed. You like that?
-What's the difference between a proto and an unl game? Define it. What happens if we find 100 betas of Barbie Super Model at varying degrees of completeness. You gonna db them all next to real games too?

They don't deserve to be in the same space as stuff you could buy in stores. I'm not even suggesting total removal and you're getting all defensive.

Post Reply